Author of the bestselling novel series THE WATCHERS OF UR, and the novella series SOLITARY. Essayist writing about the intersection of religion and politics.
Enjoyed your article…I read a good quote that reminds me of what you were saying…Barnard Baruch…”Every man has a right to his opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.”
Just happened upon a repost of your article in February about how if people disagree with you, they are stupid…aren’t you the pot calling the kettle black.? For starters, the science isn’t settled on “global warming being caused by man. You obfuscation the topic by only claiming “climate change” is a scientific fact, when in fact the models predicting calamity are flawed and have proven false. Second, if you disagree with the other side on policy but claim their fear is not justified because you drink the Kool aid of failed policies that have ruined the inner cities, you are as hypocritical as you claim they are. If you actually claim to read as much as you preach others should, I can tell you only read those you agree with because you obviously haven’t read any Bastiat or Mises, or Wanniski….maybe stop preaching the mantra of leftists looking to control another market crash and start learning about economics for yourself.
I’ve read the dissenting opinions on climate change and I find them to be unconvincing. As for the tone of the essay–you may want to lookup “satire”. It’s a thing.
June 10, 2016 at 7:36 am
Enjoyed your article…I read a good quote that reminds me of what you were saying…Barnard Baruch…”Every man has a right to his opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.”
July 23, 2016 at 6:49 pm
Just happened upon a repost of your article in February about how if people disagree with you, they are stupid…aren’t you the pot calling the kettle black.? For starters, the science isn’t settled on “global warming being caused by man. You obfuscation the topic by only claiming “climate change” is a scientific fact, when in fact the models predicting calamity are flawed and have proven false. Second, if you disagree with the other side on policy but claim their fear is not justified because you drink the Kool aid of failed policies that have ruined the inner cities, you are as hypocritical as you claim they are. If you actually claim to read as much as you preach others should, I can tell you only read those you agree with because you obviously haven’t read any Bastiat or Mises, or Wanniski….maybe stop preaching the mantra of leftists looking to control another market crash and start learning about economics for yourself.
July 23, 2016 at 7:02 pm
I’ve read the dissenting opinions on climate change and I find them to be unconvincing. As for the tone of the essay–you may want to lookup “satire”. It’s a thing.